logo for horses-helping-troubled-teens.com
Home
All readers Mustang Blog
About
Why Horses
BioTheology-book
Dr Y Thinks
Therapy Approaches
Resources
Others saying?
Links
Contact
Parents Parenting Basics
Empowering Parents
Teen Problems
Parent-Teen Services
Teen Programs
Professionals Professional Healers
Psychobiology
Psychospirituality
Jungian Archetypes
Darrell Yardley.com
Seminars
Adults Sex Therapy
Crime/Abuse Victims
Sexual Offenders
Adult Services
Other Corporate EAL
E-zine Back Issues

[?] Subscribe To This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines

LEFT for horses-helping-troubled-teens.com

Christ: Who was Jesus?

One of my personal big theological questions that I have been working on now for a several years is, who was Jesus? (And the related question of who was/is Christ.)

This writing is an attempt to summarize where I am in my thinking, studies, prayers, and experiences, in answering this question. My words here should be taken just as the point in my journey where I am right now in my own thinking and personal theology in regard to Christianity in general.

The Journey

Four years ago after exploring Zen Buddhism and Native American spirituality, I felt "called" to explore my own cultural roots in Christianity. There is much about dogmatic/orthodox Christianity that I find contradictory with our scientific understanding of the world, not to mention reason and common sense. Much of Christianity came across to me as bull shit to be blunt. This applied especially to the version of Christianity with which I was raised, i.e., Southern Baptist. (To all my Southern Baptist friends, sorry guys.)

Science and Religion

When you ask me to choose between science and religion, I will come down on the side of science every time. However, science is not the end all. There are many questions science cannot answer. Most of these are of the teleological nature about design or purpose. Science can also not test hypotheses about things it cannot measure with the senses or extensions of the senses. If you can't see, feel, taste, touch, hear, or smell it, science can tell us nothing about it. Science requires as the father of protestant Christianity philosophy, Friedrich Schleiermacher, called "sensuous" input. Input from the senses is the only way we as humans have of encountering God or the world. (Ignoring mystery or revelation for the moment, which science does.)

Agnostic Period

As a major in zoology and a student of evolutionary biology, as an undergraduate at the University of Texas at Austin, I drifted away from my religious roots. No, I ran! (Admittedly, a part of this was due to personal reasons: I was angry at God due in large part to a failed early marriage. See, "The Closet".)

It was not until our children had come along that I felt myself moving back toward the church.

Back to the Church

My journey back to the church came as the result of two Episcopal priests, The Reverends, Thomas Davis and Richard Elliot. In the Episcopal church I found an enlightened religious view that had no conflict with the findings of science, including evolution. Actually Tom got me back. Richard helped me to stay--and, at the same time, set me on my next leg of my spiritual journey.

Leaving Church--the Harley Days

Richard had given me a wonderful book by Tilden Edwards entitiled, Living Simply Through the Day. Edwards' book turned my head toward Zen Buddhism--that and Pirsig's, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintainance an Inquiry Into Values. The latter actually had nothing to do with Zen, but, hey, I was just learning myself. (Much of this part of the journey is summarized in my book WindWalker.)

This journey led me to mysticism and spirituality. My experience of religion had up to this point been intellectual or cognitive. I now entered a long phase into the mystery and experience of the spiritual side of religion. I found I had special gifts of my own that I had not developed and started developing and using these.

Returning and going deeper

God works in mysterious ways: One day in church, one of my fellow parishioners snipped at me about helping out with cooking for a meal the church was having. I had been attending irregularly and not very frequently. When I made some lame excuse, Marjorie shot back, "Look, we don't care about any of that, we just need warm bodies to help."

A door opened. I stepped through. I realized I was home. I had no need to look elsewhere. Home had been right here where I was all along. I was overcome momentarily with emotions so complex I could not define them. Tears came to my eyes. I swallowed and said I would be there.

Several years before, I had had lunch with our Rector, Tom Davis, about a book project I had been toying with, BioTheology. After we talked for a little while, Tom said something to the effect of, Darrell, your brain is over developed on the science side. You really need to get the theological side up to par. You are like muscle-bound on one side and need to work out the other.

That, in short, is how I got into the theology program that I am now in my fourth and final year. But it was several years after Tom's comment that I started the program.

OK, with that all as background, lets get back to where I am with Jesus...

The Historic Jesus

Did Jesus really exist?

Was he a real person? I think the answer to that is pretty clear. A definite, yes. The Jewish historian, Josephus, talks about him, for example. Granted only mentions him.

Josephus was interested in writing a Jewish history that would not anger the occupying Romans. So tended to be shy of controversial subjects that my piss them off.

An important point to remember in all of this is that the Romans were not happy with the Jews. There had been several attempts at rebellion against Roman rule. The Romans were determined to quickly squash any thing that hinted of rebellion.

Son of God, Son of Man?

These were phrases used for the Roman emperor. New Testament writers were trying to get their point across by using these terms with Jesus, that, while Roman might be in charge of this earthly kingdom, Jesus ruled the heavenly one.

Not to be taken literally. We must be keep in mind that Jewish writers both of the Old and New Testaments were not interested in historical facts. They were interested in getting the meaning, not the facts. Today when we think about history, we assume and demand it be factually true. That was not the case with Jewish theologians.

As described by Bishop John Selby Spong in, Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism: A Bishop Rethinks the Meaning of Scripture, Jewish writers used the technique of midrash (biblical exegesis; interpretation with connotation of investigation), which felt free to use exaggeration and fill in gaps to come up with the higher truths they were trying to get across.

A new religion?

Jesus never meant to start a new religion. He was a very devout Jew who believed in the Jewish tradition.

Had the Romans not destroyed the Temple (actually re-destroyed it) in 70 CE, Christianity would have probably never taken off as a separate religion. In destroying the Temple, the Jews were deprived of their national heritage, their center, their grounding. Romans were seen as a threat and Christians became an enemy.

The result for the ousted Christians was they needed their own Torah, there own heritage. Hence, the writings of the New Testament books began.

Virgin Birth?

As a geneticist and biologist, give me a break! Let's look at this logically.

First, the term, virgin, denoted a young woman back then. Not, as we use it today, as in not having had sexual intercourse.

Second, no mammal has been shown of capable of virgin births. Now there are some fish, amphibian, and reptiles that can do this, but no mammals.

Third, Jesus would have been a woman, not a man, if he had been born via a virgin birth. To be a male, he had to have a Y chromosome. The Y comes from only another male. Where did his Y chromosome come from? Now unless Mary was XXY (Kleinfelters Syndrome, which means she would look like a male and had very low fertility), she had to get that Y chromosome from some male.

Let's say it was a virgin birth (contemporary meaning). Then, if the Y came from God (God's got chromosomes?!), if we could just get a tiny piece of that DNA, we could clone God. Then we wouldn't need him. Stupid!

If I have not pissed off you yet about Jesus, let us move on to a more positive understanding of who he was and his importance to us...

Jesus' Divinity?

Christians maintain Christ was both fully human and fully divine. Let us take a look at this. I will cite two theologians here, Marcus Borg and Barbara Brown Taylor.

Borg, in his Meeting Jesus Again for the First Time: The Historical Jesus and the Heart of Contemporary Faith, discusses how Jesus, while he was alive was fully, and totally human--flesh and blood. After his death he became fully divine. I like this, but...

I like Taylor's description better. In her Altar in the World: A Geography of Faith, she talks about Jesus being fully human and because he was fully human, he was fully divine. To be human is to be divine! To live fully into our humanity, is to live fully our divinity.

Her's meshes with my own understanding of Jesus the best. Not to go into this too much here on this page, my view is that we as humans, along with all Creation, are made from God-stuff. Hence, we, along with everything else in Creation, are divine, holy.

Was Jesus God?

This is related to the above. Sort of the same question, just restated. My answer is, no. Or, yes. Depending on which way you look at it. He was no more god than you are I are. He was a prophet, a holy man (another meaning for the terms Son of God, Son of May).

Miracles?

His reported healing miracles, yes. The reported nature miracle, e.g. walking on water, no. As to the healing miracles, I know from my own personal experiences as a healer and my understanding of psychobiology and the power of the human mind, that healing miracles are possible, doable, and do occur.

Nature miracles? Remember midrash above.

Jesus' message

Jesus' teachings were primarily concerned with social justice, not salvation. Or, his salvation was about social justice, not everlasting life or resurrection.

Resurrection?

As someone who works regularly with the spiritual world (again see WindWalker), I believe in life after death. But the "resurrected" are all in spiritual "bodies", not a resusitation of a physical body. The Apostles had visions of Christ after his death.

And yet...

Jesus also seems to me somehow bigger than life. He was a Holy Man, but somehow there is a sense in me, he was more also...

Amen

PS

This might get me excommunicated from even the Episcopal church.
Check out Darrell G. Yardley's FaceBook Page for the latest of what is going on, discussions, and more...
Darrell G Yardley

Promote Your Page Too


Custom Search

Dr. Y "Thinks" Index

Christ--who was he?
Strange Piece of Ass Syndrome
Christian heresies
Baby boomers are dancing on... e
A Wild Ride
Dannion Brinkley
Circumcision
Why Vision Quest?
Vision Quest 1998
Enlightenment on a Harley
God, faith and the Recession
Breakfast Blessing
The Closet
God as my GPS
God as my GPS
Descartes and Christianity
Health Care Reform and Christianity



Custom Search
running mustangs Copyright © 2008-2010, Mustang Medicine Works, LLC. All rights reserved.

434 N. Garrett St., Central, SC 29630,
Voice: (864)508-0781, FAX (206) 309-0077

map   contact