| |
Healing Power of Prayer
Early scientific research indicated that prayer had a positive effect
on medical patients. A more recent and rigorous study leave that in
question.
Four scientific studies have shown that prayer
has a healing effect. These independent studies were with patients in
cardiac care units and with advanced AID’s. A fourth study was on the
effects on pregnancy. These studies indicated that when patients
are placed on prayer lists and prayed for, healing is facilitated—even
though they do not even know they are being prayed for.
These studies were significant in that not only did being prayed for
work, but
the religious affiliation did not matter. It did not matter if the they
were Christian, Jewish, Buddhist, Native American, etc. All
that mattered was that the treatment groups were prayed for. Also, it
did not matter about the type of prayer—long or short,
meditation, all had the same healing effects.
The first of these studies was a landmark study published back in 1988
by cardiologist Randolph Byrd, M.D. in the Southern Medical Journal.
(Byrd, 1988). A computer randomly assigned incoming cardiac patients at
the San Francisco General Hospital to either home prayer groups (192
patients) or a control group that was not prayed for (201 patients). In
scientific lingo, it was a randomized, double-blind experiment in which
neither patients, their doctors, nor their nurses knew who was assigned
to what group. The study found that the prayed-for patients: 1) were
five times less likely to need antibiotics; 2) were three times less
likely to develop pulmonary edema; 3) did not require artificial
airways attached to a ventilator to be placed in their throat (while
twelve of the non-prayed-for group did); and 4) had fewer deaths.
Ten years later another group of San Francisco researchers at another
medical center published the results of a study on patients with
advanced AIDS (Sicher et al., 1998). Along with prayer,
various other forms of distance healing were used, including psychic
healing. Again patients were assigned to the prayer (treatment) groups
or non-prayer (control) group in a double-blind, randomized design.
Healers (those doing the praying and healing) were located throughout
the United States. These healers represented a variety of healing
traditions. After six months the patients charts were examined and
scored for a several AIDS-related symptoms. The study found that the
treatment group had fewer AIDS-defining illnesses, were not as sick,
and required fewer doctor visits, hospitalizations, and days in the
hospital. They also showed improved moods.
A fourth study looked at the effects of prayer on
pregnancy rates. Published in 2001 in the Journal of Reproductive Medicine,
the objective of this study was to assess the effect of prayer on women
undergoing in vitro
fertilization (Kwang et al., 2001). The women were in a clinic in
Seoul, South Korea, and the prayer groups were located in the United
States, Canada, and Australia. The researchers were located at yet
another location at a medical center in the US. The results were that
the prayed-for group had both significantly higher pregnancy and
implantation rates. It appears that prayer can also affect pregnancy
rates.
A more recent pilot study reported in 2001 also indicate
positive results (Krucoff, et al., 2001). This study was done at Duke
University Medical Center for patients in
their cardiac unit (American
Heart Journal). In this ambitious and
scientifically rigorous study, several “non-traditional” approaches
were examined—prayer, stress reduction, guided imagery, and
touch
therapy. Again, the prayers were from a variety of healing traditions.
While the number of patients used in this pilot study was too small to
show statistically significant results, overall there was a positive
effect on patients for all of the non-traditional approaches. Prayer,
however, had the biggest effect. Patients that were prayed for had the
lowest short-term and long-term complication rates.
Results from large study at Harvard University Medical
School was reported in 2006 (Benson, et al. 2006).
These researchers concluded that intercessory prayer itself had no
effect on complication-free recovery from coronary artery bypass
grafts. In fact, they found that those patients that knew they
were receiving intercessory prayer had a higher incidence of
complications.
Results from the larger Duke University study are sill pending.
So while early less rigorous studies indicated that prayer might
facilitate healing, the more recent, larger, and rigorous study does
not support this hypothesis.
Literature
Cited
- Benson, J, et al. 2006. Study of the
therapeutic effects of intercessory prayer (STEP) in cardiac bypass
patients: a multicenter randomized trial of uncertainty and certainty
of receiving intercessory prayer. Am
Heart J. ;151:934–942.
- Byrd RC. 1988. Positive therapeutic effects of
intercessory prayer in a coronary care unit population. Southern Medical Journal
81(7): 826-829.
- Krucoff, M., et al. 2001. Integrative noetic
therapies as adjuncts to percutaneous intervention during
unstable coronary syndromes: Monitoring and Actualization of
Noetic Training (MANTRA) feasibility pilot. American Heart Journal
142:760-767.
- Kwang Y. Cha, M.D., Daniel P. Wirth, J.D.,
M.S., and Rogerio A. Lobo, M.D. 2001. Does prayer influence the success
of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer?: report of a masked,
randomized trial.
Journal Reproductive Medicine 46: 781-787
- Sicher, F., E. Targ, D. Moore, II, and H.
Smith. 1998. A randomized double-blind study of the effect of distance
healing in a population with advanced AIDS. Western J. Medicine
169: 356-363.
__________________________________
|

Enroll in our free e-newsletter, Mustang Medicine Works Mental Musings,
now and get a free e-booklet,
Basic Meditation, by Darrell Yardley, click
here
Join us on Twitter.com
|